After taking charge as a law minister Mr. Verrappa Moily has declared that he will give preference to the election reform. Detail information regarding numbers of votes casted in favour of candidates in recently held election of 15th loksabha has now been known to every body.
Taking review of data, it is observed that statement of Mr.Moily is an important matter. In Bihar, in Nowada parliamentary constituency, Mr. Bhola Singh declared elected as he got the 1,30,608 votes in his favour which is less than 10 % of total 14 lacs voters in constituency, still he has been declared elected. As he got the more number of votes among the 21 candidates contested in election. There are such 145 representative/MP who could secured less than 20% of total votes.
In short they are representing the constituency of people in which majority of people have not casted votes in their favour. From 1977, there is reduction/decrease in numbers of votes secured by winning candidates. In addition to that percentage of votes caste is also decreasing, due to which proportion of candidates getting opinion of majority is declining. If such situation is continued, then time will come when representative getting minority of opinion will rule the country. Hence it is important to give preference to verify, why peoples are becoming so indifferent about election. For this it is necessary to think about how to increase participation of voters in election and what machinery and system will have to adapt so as to enable the candidates to get majority opinion of voters.
Defects in present system:- We have accepted west minister system of Britain for election. Accordingly candidates who gets maximum votes is declared elected. This is also known as first past the post system. When in election only two candidate contest the election, winning candidates gets more than 50% votes then at that time this system works well.
But in India, there are many parties. Election contest is multicoloured. In that case even if candidate getting maximum number of votes is declared elected, still it is not sure that he would get more than 50%votes. In short candidate denied by majority of opinion (More than 50%) can be get elected. Then how can he be called peoples representative? Because of this in many European countries, where there are more than two parties, there the system of “first past the post system is not adapted. There, the proportionate representation or presidential system is adapted.
On this back ground India should also reconsider about “First past the post” system of election not only due to numbers of political party but also due to social and economical composition of voters constituency.
In our most of the voters constituency, the election is contested on the basis of religion, caste and language. If there is a 30 % population of particular caste of voters in one voter constituency, then candidate of that particular caste can get easily elected. Due to which political parties is also giving tickets to that candidate who belong to that particular caste. In this way other voters in that constituency are neglected. In our election, rowdyism, wealth power plays important role. Because of this there is a increase in proportion of inclusion of criminal minded people in politics. To prevent this tendency, our election should be more representative oriented, giving more preference to the good nature and good character people. Our ex president Mr.Krishnakanth had suggested for giving permission to the run off system of negative votes. Law commission had also recommended such type of system. Political party should think sincerely over it. In present election system, candidates who secure maximum votes but 20% or less than 20% of total voters, is declared elected. In run off system, re election is held between first two candidates who secure maximum votes and in re election, candidates getting more votes is declared elected. In election system of giving permission to negative votes for one time, negative votes are deducted from the positive votes secured by candidates.
Suppose in one of the voter constituency of 15 lac voters, candidates name A,B,C,D, these four candidates has secured 4lac, 3.6lac, 3.5lac, & 3.5lac votes respectively and A candidates being criminal minded, secure 100000, 10000, 8000, and 9000 negative votes respectively. These negative votes if deducted from their total votes secured by the candidates then four candidate will receive 3lac, 3.5lac, & 3.42 lac, and 3.41lac respectively. Then re election will be held between B & C candidates. In that election candidates getting more votes will declared elected. In this run of system, where one time negative vote is allowed, has some benefit. First is in specific constituency system of giving preference to specific candidates of specific caste will end. Because in our country, proportion of voter constituency compromising more than 50% of specific caste is very rare. Due to which other voters can expressed their displeasure by casting their negative votes in case, candidates of specific caste is given preference in the constituency compromising majority voters of specific caste but less than 50%. In addition to that, candidate will make an effort to get support from all constituents of society, due to which caste ism and religious dispute in society will be restraint/ checked in some proportion.
Second benefit is due to negative votes, political party will play more moral role and will start denying tickets to the criminal back ground candidate. In this way, criminal mind can be kept away from election.
Because of this also, violence during election period will also be reduced. and election will be conducted peacefully. Due to this system voters can tell effectively which candidates they don’t need. Due to this political party will also take review of voters mind before allotting tickets to the candidate.
Reelection Provision:- If no candidate has secured majority of votes, then there is a provision of conducting reelection between first two candidates in this system even if there is a possibilities of creation of botheration of conducting re election, but due to electronic voting machine, conducting an reelection will be easier. Immediate after result in few days or within a week, reelection can be conducted. System of conducting reelection in case of hijacking of election booth illegally, is prevalent in our system. Country like Iran has also adapted this run off system in recently held election of president in Iran. and demonstration are being held in Iran for taking re election due to improper occurrence during election.
Run off system & negative voting system are two different concepts. If system of negatives is not preferred then election can be conducted with run off method. But if these two methods are combined to gather, and if implemented then it will have more effectiveness and one can observe more effect. All improper occurrence and immoral behavior, evil path during election, can be avoided/ stop. Hence it is necessary for giving thought to it. in this regard, there should be an unanimous of opinion of all the political parties.
If election are conducted on the basis of this system in our country, then our democracy will be in more proportionate, representing the people, more energetic and strong. Only after that democracy will remain away from wealth power, criminal elements, and politics of votes.
|
|
|




Recent Comments